=> Bootstrap dependency digest>=20010302: found digest-20121220
WARNING: [license.mk] Every package should define a LICENSE.
===> Skipping vulnerability checks.
WARNING: No /var/db/pkg/pkg-vulnerabilities file found.
WARNING: To fix run: `/usr/sbin/pkg_admin -K /var/db/pkg fetch-pkg-vulnerabilities'.
=> Checksum SHA1 OK for sbcl-1.1.8-source.tar.bz2
=> Checksum RMD160 OK for sbcl-1.1.8-source.tar.bz2
===> Installing dependencies for sbcl-1.1.8nb1
=> Tool dependency gmake>=3.81: found gmake-3.82nb7
=> Tool dependency checkperms>=1.1: found checkperms-1.11
=> Build dependency clisp-[0-9]*: found clisp-2.49nb18
=> Full dependency gtar-base>=1.13.25: found gtar-base-1.26nb2
===> Overriding tools for sbcl-1.1.8nb1
===> Extracting for sbcl-1.1.8nb1
===> Patching for sbcl-1.1.8nb1
=> Applying pkgsrc patches for sbcl-1.1.8nb1
=> Verifying /data/pkgsrc/lang/sbcl/patches/patch-ab
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /data/pkgsrc/lang/sbcl/patches/patch-ab
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ab,v 1.4 2012/11/02 20:59:07 asau Exp $
|
|--- doc/sbcl.1.orig	2012-11-02 09:42:10.000000000 +0000
|+++ doc/sbcl.1
--------------------------
Patching file doc/sbcl.1 using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 427.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 461.
done
=> Verifying /data/pkgsrc/lang/sbcl/patches/patch-ad
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /data/pkgsrc/lang/sbcl/patches/patch-ad
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ad,v 1.4 2009/08/19 13:03:30 asau Exp $
|
|--- contrib/asdf-install/installer.lisp.orig	2008-02-27 19:56:30.000000000 +0300
|+++ contrib/asdf-install/installer.lisp	2009-05-24 10:44:06.000000000 +0400
--------------------------
Patching file contrib/asdf-install/installer.lisp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 266 (offset 2 lines).
done
=> Verifying /data/pkgsrc/lang/sbcl/patches/patch-ae
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /data/pkgsrc/lang/sbcl/patches/patch-ae
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-ae,v 1.2 2011/12/05 23:02:18 asau Exp $
|
|Disable failing tests.
|
|--- contrib/sb-posix/posix-tests.lisp.orig	2010-02-03 13:04:33.000000000 +0300
|+++ contrib/sb-posix/posix-tests.lisp	2010-04-21 17:00:44.000000000 +0400
--------------------------
Patching file contrib/sb-posix/posix-tests.lisp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 662 (offset 49 lines).
done
=> Verifying /data/pkgsrc/lang/sbcl/patches/patch-revert-37d3828773e2f847bb1ed7522b0af4fb8e736fc8
=> Applying pkgsrc patch /data/pkgsrc/lang/sbcl/patches/patch-revert-37d3828773e2f847bb1ed7522b0af4fb8e736fc8
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$NetBSD: patch-revert-37d3828773e2f847bb1ed7522b0af4fb8e736fc8,v 1.2 2013/06/15 21:17:23 asau Exp $
|
|Suppress test introduced by revision 37d3828773e2f847bb1ed7522b0af4fb8e736fc8
|which breaks build on NetBSD.
|
|diff --git a/contrib/sb-sprof/Makefile contrib/sb-sprof/Makefile
|index 7373c72..463ae52 100644
|--- contrib/sb-sprof/Makefile
|+++ contrib/sb-sprof/Makefile
--------------------------
Patching file contrib/sb-sprof/Makefile using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2.
done
===> Creating toolchain wrappers for sbcl-1.1.8nb1
===> Configuring for sbcl-1.1.8nb1
=> Fixing absolute paths.
INFO: [subst.mk:fix-paths] Nothing changed in ./install.sh.
INFO: [subst.mk:fix-paths] Nothing changed in ./src/runtime/runtime.c.
=> Fixing GNU tar references.
=> Checking for portability problems in extracted files
